
**How many independent local observers are required to uniquely identify one of \( n = L^d \) independent critical configurations?** We establish a conditional birthday-style upper bound \( K^* \leq \lceil 2d \log_2 L / H_{r2}(\infty) \rceil + O(1) \) assuming spatial decorrelation, with a conjectured factor-2 lower bound. For \( S_q \)-symmetric Potts models at continuous critical points we conjecture greedy tightness \( \Delta \in \{0,1\} \). Using sampling data for \( q=2,3,4 \) Potts and the BEG tricritical model, we verify the formula across four universality classes. For Ising (\( q=2 \)), a Temperley-Lieb algebra decomposition gives an exact orbit count verified to \( \leq 0.01 \) bits at \( w=3,7,8,9 \). A quantum extension to measurement-induced phase transitions empirically gives finite \( K^* \) near the area-law phase. v3 changelog: Corrected w=6 boundary case. Previous versions stated j=3 ghost sector inactive at w=6; 20 independent Monte Carlo runs (L=256+512) show partial activation ω₃ = 0.415 ± 0.033 (13.3σ above zero). The ghost condition [4]=0 kills the linear Markov trace but NOT the quadratic collision probability. v4: Three rounds of honest-hedging revisions — (1) dropped "universal" from title/abstract; α-invariant downgraded to exploratory conjecture; w=6 data updated to 20 runs, ω₃=0.415±0.033 (13.3σ). (2) TL/ghost paragraph restructured into proved/empirical/heuristic layers; quantum section compressed to Discussion. (3) Added auditable K*_greedy methods paragraph; α-invariant section renamed "CONJECTURES"; FK heuristic marked conditional.
Temperley-Lieb algebra, observer convergence, Potts model, birthday bound, critical phenomena, collision entropy
Temperley-Lieb algebra, observer convergence, Potts model, birthday bound, critical phenomena, collision entropy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
