Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

DEIP — Domain Enterprise Integration Pattern: A Semantic Control Plane for Enterprise Integration Governance - v2.0

Authors: Ricardo Luz Holanda, Viana;

DEIP — Domain Enterprise Integration Pattern: A Semantic Control Plane for Enterprise Integration Governance - v2.0

Abstract

⚠️ Reading Order — Start with GDCR. GDCR (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18582492) is the foundation. Begin there. Every other layer builds on top of it. What is DEIP? Imagine your company has 10 different systems — SAP, Salesforce, Workday, Stripe, and more. Every time you need them to talk to each other, someone builds a direct connection. After a while you have hundreds of connections, nobody knows what connects to what, and changing one system breaks everything else. DEIP fixes this at the root. The idea is simple: stop organizing integrations by technology. Start organizing by business domain. Instead of asking "which system do I call?" — you ask "what is the business intent?" The 6-Step Decision Pipeline DEIP gives you a structured way to make every integration decision — once, consistently, for the entire enterprise: Step 1 — Intent: What is the business purpose? Example: sales order creation Step 2 — Interaction Type: How does it communicate? Request? Event? Batch? Stream? Step 3 — Quality Profile: What does it need? Low latency? High reliability? Audit trail? Step 4 — Integration Capability: What architectural pattern fits? API mediation? Event streaming? CDC replication? Step 5 — Protocol Profile: What transport? REST? Kafka? MQTT? SOAP? Step 6 — Platform Binding: Where does it run? SAP CPI? Kong? AWS? Azure? Same pipeline. Every integration. Every domain. Every team. What does this eliminate? Problem Before DEIP After DEIP Too many proxies 1 proxy per backend system 1 proxy per business domain Too many packages Named by vendor or project Named by domain Vendor onboarding Hours to days 30 seconds — 1 metadata entry Routing logic Hardcoded in every proxy In the metadata control plane AI agent integration Ad-hoc, ungoverned Domain-semantic, governed The Runtime — SDIA Ecosystem When DEIP makes a decision, SDIA executes it: Consumer → /sales/orders/create/salesforce └── GDCR — 1 gateway per domain └── DDCR — resolves f(key) → value in <4ms └── Execution Platform └── ODCP — governs artifacts └── DCEP — governs events └── DCBP — governs data Every layer. Same domain. Same invariant. Validated Results ~2,067,904 requests · 8 platforms · 5 languages · 100% routing accuracy · zero routing failures · sub-4ms resolution latency · 99.99% uptime The one rule that governs everything: The domain intent is the only valid primary key for integration governance. Technology is transient. The domain never lies. DOI Ecosystem GDCR v7.0: 10.5281/zenodo.18582492 ← Start here DDCR v2.0: 10.5281/zenodo.18864832 ODCP v2.0: 10.5281/zenodo.18876593 SDIA v2.0: 10.5281/zenodo.18877635 DCEP v1.0: 10.5281/zenodo.19068766 DCBP: Under active development Version History Version Status DOI v2.0 ✅ CURRENT zenodo.org/records/19004802 v1.0 ⚠️ Superseded zenodo.org/records/19004802 Links Repository: github.com/rhviana/deip DEIP (this document): https://zenodo.org/records/19004802 GDCR (Start here): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18582492 Citation (v2.0) APA: Viana, R. L. H. (2026). DEIP — Domain Enterprise Integration Pattern: A Semantic Control Plane for Enterprise Integration Governance — Version 2.0. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/19004802 Author Ricardo Luz Holanda Viana Enterprise Integration Architect | Creator of DEIP Ecosystem | SAP BTP Integration Suite Expert | SAP Press Author Warsaw, Poland · March 2026 · ORCID: 0009-0009-9549-5862 "Technology changes by the quarter. Business processes last for decades. The domain never lies."

Keywords

protocol sprawl, domain-driven architecture, GDCR, DDCR, agentic integration, SDIA, enterprise integration, semantic control plane, integration governance, platform sprawl, ODCP, API governance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average