Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Generative AI in Enterprise Quality Assurance: Applications, Challenges, and Governance Frameworks

Authors: Rajaseakaran Nair, Rajeshkumar;

Generative AI in Enterprise Quality Assurance: Applications, Challenges, and Governance Frameworks

Abstract

This paper examines the growing impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), including large language models and multimodal foundation models, on enterprise software quality assurance. While existing research has largely focused on isolated use cases such as test case generation or defect prediction, there remains a significant gap in understanding how GenAI can be systematically integrated across the full quality assurance lifecycle in high-volume, mission-critical enterprise systems. To address this gap, the paper proposes a comprehensive and practitioner-informed framework for the responsible adoption and governance of GenAI in enterprise quality engineering. The Generative AI Quality Assurance Governance Framework (GAQAGF) is introduced as a structured model consisting of four integrated layers: intelligent capability alignment, domain context injection, validation governance, and continuous assurance feedback. The study further identifies and formalizes seven categories of failure modes specific to enterprise transaction environments, including business rule hallucination, transaction state inconsistency, compliance misalignment, temporal context degradation, cross-service semantic drift, regulatory constraint bypass, and adversarial input blindness. These failure modes highlight the unique risks introduced by GenAI when applied to complex, distributed enterprise systems. Empirical observations from enterprise case studies across retail transaction platforms, financial systems, and telecommunications provisioning environments demonstrate measurable improvements when structured GenAI governance is applied. These include up to 47% improvement in test coverage, 63% reduction in manual test authoring effort, and 38% improvement in edge case defect detection, along with significant gains in AI-generated test quality. In addition, the paper introduces a maturity model for enterprise GenAI adoption, outlining a progression from experimental usage to fully governed, continuous assurance ecosystems. The work contributes to the broader fields of AI-assisted software engineering, enterprise systems, and digital transformation by providing both conceptual and practical foundations for integrating GenAI into mission-critical quality assurance workflows.

Keywords

Risk Management, Large Language Models, Software Testing Automation, Software Quality Assurance, Generative AI, AI Testing, Enterprise Systems, Validation Governance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average