Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

GDI D1.7 Project communication strategy - final evaluation and review

Authors: Tseng, Zippy;

GDI D1.7 Project communication strategy - final evaluation and review

Abstract

This document presents the final evaluation of the GDI project communications, as defined in D1.2 GDI Project communication strategy1 and D1.5 Project communication strategy – update and evaluation2. It presents quantitative data to measure the effectiveness of GDI communications and dissemination activities between November 2024 and December 2025. The evaluation draws on data from the project website, newsletters and social media platforms (X and LinkedIn). Dissemination indicators, including participation in external events, publications and project outputs on Zenodo, are also evaluated. These data provide an overview of how the GDI project has communicated its project objectives and outputs to key stakeholders and wider audiences. The results of the evaluation show that the project has effectively implemented the D1.2 and D1.5, sharing project highlights across main communications channels. The website continued to serve as the primary communication channel for the project information, highlighting the project’s technical progress, collaboration with other EU projects and sustainability plan. The newsletter remained an effective way to communicate project results, with an increase in subscriber numbers. There is a significant improvement in social media engagement, especially LinkedIn, since the last project communication strategy review in October 2024. As recommended in D1.5, the GDI project has increased posting frequency, curated thematic campaigns on project deliverables and promoted the project objectives and outputs through video content. These approaches led to substantial growth in LinkedIn followers, impressions and engagement rate. The paid LinkedIn campaign has also successfully extended the project’s reach beyond the research community to policymakers, healthcare professionals and citizens. Dissemination activities performed strongly with project partners actively presenting GDI results at conferences, workshops and meetings. Zenodo continued to function as the main repository for project outputs, achieving high levels of views and downloads and supporting open access and reuse. The project successfully implemented four key improvements listed in D1.5: increasing and optimising social media activity, expanding newsletter outreach, monitoring engagement metrics and highlighting GDI outputs through engaging video content. The project will follow the strategy in D1.5 and continue to work on communications and dissemination activities to support sustainability and impact beyond the project.

Related Organizations
Keywords

European Genomic Data Infrastructure, 1+ Million Genomes Initiative, 1+MG, GDI, Communication strategy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green