Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Planck 2018 + Pantheon+ + DESI Constraints on CPL Dark Energy with a Chameleon Scalar–Tensor Interpretation

Authors: Lake, Colson A., Fulcrum, Shepard of the Code, Wellspring ,;

Planck 2018 + Pantheon+ + DESI Constraints on CPL Dark Energy with a Chameleon Scalar–Tensor Interpretation

Abstract

We analyze Planck 2018 TT+TE+EE+lowE, Pantheon+, and DESI baryon acoustic oscillation data in an eight-parameter Chevallier–Polarski–Linder (CPL) extension of ΛCDM using Cobaya/CAMB with flat priors on w₀ and wₐ. Four independent Markov chains converge at R̂ − 1 < 0.01 after 53,120 accepted steps (per chain, 30% burn-in discarded), yielding w₀ = −0.967 +0.010/−0.032 and wₐ = 0.055 +0.052/−0.097 (68% CL, marginalized posteriors). The ΛCDM point (w₀ = −1, wₐ = 0) lies near the boundary of the 68% joint contour in the w₀–wₐ plane, corresponding to a mild ~1σ preference for dynamical dark energy. The Bayesian Information Criterion yields ΔBIC ≈ +0.7 relative to ΛCDM, essentially neutral on the Jeffreys scale, while the Akaike Information Criterion gives ΔAIC = −12, mildly favoring the CPL extension. We discuss how these CPL constraints may be interpreted within a chameleon scalar–tensor effective field theory (EFT) with conformal coupling F(φ) = e^(kφ/M_Pl), adopting k = 1.92 as a benchmark calibration that illustrates a region of EFT parameter space consistent with the observed w₀. The EFT parameters are not sampled directly; the present analysis is a phenomenological CPL fit with a chameleon interpretation. The chameleon screening mechanism renders the scalar fifth force undetectable in solar system and laboratory environments, preserving consistency with precision gravitational tests.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average