
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is progressively emerging as a significant instrument for enhancing clinical processes due to the quick development of digital technology in dentistry. Digital radiographs, CBCT scans, intraoral scans, and electronic health records all produce vast volumes of complicated data that might be challenging to manually analyze in modern dentistry practices. By evaluating these datasets, AI systems may assist physicians in identifying anomalies, assisting with treatment planning, and directing decision-making. By automating processes like picture segmentation, margin detection, and prosthetic design, such systems could improve diagnosis accuracy, decrease clinician variability, and streamline operations. Despite its potential, AI incorporation into routine dentistry treatment is still in its infancy due to issues with dataset quality, algorithm transparency, ethical considerations, and clinician acceptability. Research indicates promising improvements in workflow and diagnosis accuracy, but there is still little data on actual results. Clinical decision-making may benefit greatly from AI, but its efficacy requires meticulous validation and cautious integration with current digital procedures. It is therefore essential to comprehend the possibilities and constraints of AI in dentistry. An overview of recent studies on clinical AI applications in digital workflows is given in this review, which emphasizes how AI may help with diagnosis and treatment planning while also pointing out areas that require more research to guarantee safe and efficient use in everyday practice.
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Dentistry, Clinical Workflow, CAD/CAM, Diagnostic Accuracy.
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Dentistry, Clinical Workflow, CAD/CAM, Diagnostic Accuracy.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
