
This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Hypoglycemic Confidence Scale (HCS) and to examine its applicability through qualitative analysis. A mixed-methods embedded design with embedded instrument development and validation variant was used for scale adaptation and validation. The sample consisted of 301 individuals with diabetes attending the endocrinology outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Data were collected using a sociodemographic form, the HCS, the Hypoglycemia Fear Scale, and a semi-structured interview form. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic and descriptive methods. As a result, it was found that the Turkish version of the HCS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing confidence in managing hypoglycemia among individuals with diabetes. The integration of qualitative findings further supports its clinical applicability. The scale may be useful in nursing education and counseling interventions aimed at strengthening hypoglycemia management confidence.
Diabetes Mellitus; hypoglycemia; psychometrics; reliability; scale adaptation; self-confidence; validity
Diabetes Mellitus; hypoglycemia; psychometrics; reliability; scale adaptation; self-confidence; validity
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
