
Traditional benchmarking measures how systems fail. The Mean Conditions for Instability (MCI) methodology measures something far more operationally relevant: the precise conditions under which systems stop behaving predictably. This paper introduces a stability-first benchmarking framework that detects instability onset using reproducible statistical indicators of jitter, nonlinear latency, and resource oscillation. The result is a quantifiable stability envelope that architects and operators can use to define reliable deployment boundaries.
Benchmarking, Benchmarking/standards, Mean Conditions for Instability, Human-Centered Epistemics, Benchmarking/classification, MCI, Benchmarking/methods, Harper's Law
Benchmarking, Benchmarking/standards, Mean Conditions for Instability, Human-Centered Epistemics, Benchmarking/classification, MCI, Benchmarking/methods, Harper's Law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
