
We present a minimal ontological constitution for the DCQ–FBT programme. Rather than proposing a complete dynamical model, this paper identifies the structural conditions under which a physical theory may count as admissible within the present framework. The central claim is that physical reality is not fundamentally object-based or field-based, but is instead grounded in invariant geometric and algebraic structure. Within this view, phase space, observables, dynamical histories, and discrete physical sectors arise as constrained readouts of a deeper symplectic and topological substrate. We formulate four postulates that define this constitutional layer: (i) Structural Realism, specifying the ontological primacy of invariant structure; (ii) Symplectic Admissibility, defining the criterion of physical observability; (iii) Modal Determinism, characterizing the structural selection of realized histories; and (iv) Topological Locking, explaining the stability of discrete, integer-valued, and quantized sectors. These postulates do not by themselves constitute a finished physical theory. Their role is to delimit the admissible form of any realization in which emergent spacetime, admissible phase space, and topologically protected observables arise from an underlying geometric parent.
Fracture–Berry– Tension framework (FBT), topological invariants, admissibility criteria, DCQ– FBT framework, structural realism; symplectic geometry; ontological architecture; topological invariants; emergent spacetime; admissibility criteria; geometric quantization; DCQ– FBT framework 1, discrete–continuous–quantum correspondence (DCQ), six-bit binary configuration space, structural realism, four-gate tension algebra, unified tension field, symplectic geometry, ontological architecture, emergent spacetime, spectrum–Chern duality, structural entropy ln 24, geometric quantization
Fracture–Berry– Tension framework (FBT), topological invariants, admissibility criteria, DCQ– FBT framework, structural realism; symplectic geometry; ontological architecture; topological invariants; emergent spacetime; admissibility criteria; geometric quantization; DCQ– FBT framework 1, discrete–continuous–quantum correspondence (DCQ), six-bit binary configuration space, structural realism, four-gate tension algebra, unified tension field, symplectic geometry, ontological architecture, emergent spacetime, spectrum–Chern duality, structural entropy ln 24, geometric quantization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
