
The persistent rise in graduate unemployment in Nigeria has raised concerns about the relevance and currency of university curricula, particularly in state-owned universities. Despite national policy directives emphasizing skills-oriented, labour-market-responsive curricula, evidence suggests a widening gap between curricular content and workplace demands. This study, therefore, examined lecturers’ perceptions of curriculum currency and its influence on graduate employability in selected state universities in southeastern Nigeria. A comparative descriptive survey design, complemented by qualitative inquiry, was adopted. Participants comprised 200 lecturers drawn from Ebonyi State University and Imo State University, representing faculties of education, arts, and social sciences. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and a semi-structured interview guide. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and inferential techniques, while qualitative data were thematically analysed. Findings revealed that lecturers perceived the existing curricula as moderately outdated, particularly in terms of digital competencies, industry relevance, and the integration of practical skills. A significant relationship was established between perceived curriculum currency and graduate employability. Although lecturers from Imo State University reported slightly higher perceptions of curriculum relevance than their counterparts from Ebonyi State University, both institutions faced similar systemic challenges. The study underscores the need for continuous curriculum review, stronger university-industry collaboration, and sustained professional development for lecturers to enhance graduate employability in Nigeria.
curriculum currency, graduate employability, lecturers' perceptions, state universities, southeastern Nigeria
curriculum currency, graduate employability, lecturers' perceptions, state universities, southeastern Nigeria
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
