
This study investigates how generative artificial intelligence can be transformed from a text-producing tool into a cognitive scaffold in academic writing instruction. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 64 first-year university students (aged 17–19) enrolled in an English-medium program in Uzbekistan. Participants were divided into the AI- Assisted Writing Group using conventional AI-assisted writing and the Socratic-AI Guided Writing Group applying a structured Socratic-AI scaffolding model. Over eight weeks, students completed argumentative writing tasks. Results show that the experimental group demonstrated greater improvement in argument structure, logical coherence, and metacognitive awareness. The findings suggest that structured Socratic prompting can reposition AI from a passive writing assistant to an active cognitive mediator in academic writing development.
generative AI, academic writing, scaffolding, Socratic questioning, metacognition
generative AI, academic writing, scaffolding, Socratic questioning, metacognition
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
