Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The 8 Structural Failures of the Expanding Universe: A Mechanical Deconstruction in TVS23

Authors: ACOSTA PADILLA, ALFREDO LUIS;

The 8 Structural Failures of the Expanding Universe: A Mechanical Deconstruction in TVS23

Abstract

The standard cosmological model (ΛCDM) rests on the hypothesis that the universe expands like an inflating balloon. We identify eight structural failures of this hypothesis — not observational discrepancies, but internal logical contradictions — each requiring an independent patch with new free parameters and no physical mechanism. The failures are: (1) superluminal recession at 10c for the CMB, (2) horizon problem requiring inflation with >10 free parameters, (3) flatness problem requiring initial conditions fine-tuned to 1 in 10^60, (4) coincidence problem resolved only by anthropic principle, (5) Hubble tension at 5 sigma between local and CMB measurements, (6) initial singularity where physics breaks down, (7) dark matter undetected after 50 years of search at LHC, XENON, LUX and PandaX, (8) selective vacuum anisotropy — the same vacuum attracts below 1.21 Mpc and repels above it with no physical mechanism. All eight failures dissolve in TVS23, where the vacuum is a rigid elastic lattice V23 with 23 channels, redshift is photon dissipation over distance, and all cosmological parameters derive from the discriminant Δ=−23 of x³−x−1=0 with zero free parameters.

Keywords

expanding universe, ΛCDM, dark matter, dark energy, Hubble tension, horizon problem, flatness problem, cosmological singularity, tired light, structured vacuum, TVS23, V23 network, cosmological redshift, inflation, coincidence problem, Andromeda, vacion, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology Mathematical Physics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!