
The article examines emotion- and feeling-oriented methods of manipulative influence in American and Russian film discourse, using dialogues from contemporary feature films and TV series as empirical material. The study focuses on three of the most common emotional tactics of speech manipulation – reproach, provocation, and threat. The linguistic means of their realization are analyzed, and the semantic types of their actualization are identified; the degree of each tactic’s implicitness and explicitness, as well as restraint and expressiveness, is examined. Particular attention is paid to the culture-specific features of their implementation, which make it possible to reveal similarities and differences in the mechanisms of speech manipulation typical of American and Russian linguocultures. The findings indicate that in the English-language material, manipulative tactics tend to manifest themselves predominantly in a mild, indirect form and less frequently involve direct negative evaluation, whereas in Russian-language film discourse, on the contrary, emotionally charged, overt, and often aggressive forms of influence prevail. These differences reflect culturally conditioned norms of interaction, typical communicative expectations, and narrative conventions of the two linguocultures and contribute to the understanding of nationally conditioned models of verbal behavior in the media discourse of contemporary screen culture.
film discourse, speech manipulation, emotionality, speech tactics, reproach, provocation, threat
film discourse, speech manipulation, emotionality, speech tactics, reproach, provocation, threat
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
