Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

СПОСОБЫ РЕЧЕВОГО МАНИПУЛИРОВАНИЯ ЭМОЦИЯМИ И ЧУВСТВАМИ В АМЕРИКАНСКОМ И РОССИЙСКОМ КИНОДИСКУРСЕ

СПОСОБЫ РЕЧЕВОГО МАНИПУЛИРОВАНИЯ ЭМОЦИЯМИ И ЧУВСТВАМИ В АМЕРИКАНСКОМ И РОССИЙСКОМ КИНОДИСКУРСЕ

Abstract

The article examines emotion- and feeling-oriented methods of manipulative influence in American and Russian film discourse, using dialogues from contemporary feature films and TV series as empirical material. The study focuses on three of the most common emotional tactics of speech manipulation – reproach, provocation, and threat. The linguistic means of their realization are analyzed, and the semantic types of their actualization are identified; the degree of each tactic’s implicitness and explicitness, as well as restraint and expressiveness, is examined. Particular attention is paid to the culture-specific features of their implementation, which make it possible to reveal similarities and differences in the mechanisms of speech manipulation typical of American and Russian linguocultures. The findings indicate that in the English-language material, manipulative tactics tend to manifest themselves predominantly in a mild, indirect form and less frequently involve direct negative evaluation, whereas in Russian-language film discourse, on the contrary, emotionally charged, overt, and often aggressive forms of influence prevail. These differences reflect culturally conditioned norms of interaction, typical communicative expectations, and narrative conventions of the two linguocultures and contribute to the understanding of nationally conditioned models of verbal behavior in the media discourse of contemporary screen culture.

Related Organizations
Keywords

film discourse, speech manipulation, emotionality, speech tactics, reproach, provocation, threat

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average