Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Prospective Comparative Study of Efficacy of Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix in the Management of Diabetic and Trophic Ulcers

Authors: International Journal of Medical Science and Innovative Research (IJMSIR);

A Prospective Comparative Study of Efficacy of Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix in the Management of Diabetic and Trophic Ulcers

Abstract

Abstract Background: Chronic non-healing ulcers represent a significant burden to patients and healthcare systems, particularly in diabetic and trophic ulcers. Conventional dressings often require frequent changes and prolonged hospital stay. Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) has emerged as a regenerative modality promoting wound healing through sustained release of growth factors. Aim: To compare the efficacy of autologous PRFM dressing with conventional povidone-iodine dressing in the management of diabetic and trophic ulcers. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted over 18 months (2022–2024) in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 100 patients with chronic ulcers were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (Cases): PRFM dressing (n=50) Group B (Controls): Conventional povidone-iodine dressing (n=50) Patients were assessed for reduction in wound surface area, wound depth, duration of hospital stay, and total number of dressings required. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The mean percentage reduction in wound surface area was significantly higher in the PRFM group (64.2 ± 8.52%) compared to controls (49.7 ± 7.83%) (p<0.001). Mean wound depth reduction was also superior in the PRFM group (79.3 ± 10.1%) versus controls (60.4 ± 12.0%) (p<0.001). The PRFM group had significantly shorter hospital stay (10.5 ± 3.2 days vs 20.4 ± 6.19 days) and required fewer dressings (6.32 ± 1.22 vs 25.0 ± 3.86). Conclusion: Autologous PRFM dressing is a safe, effective, and superior alternative to conventional dressings in chronic diabetic and trophic ulcers, offering faster healing, reduced hospital stay, and improved patient compliance.

Keywords

Platelet-Rich Fibrin, Chronic Ulcers, Diabetic Foot, Trophic Ulcers, Wound Healing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!