Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The closure debate: A prospective comparative study of mesh suture repair v/s Conventional mass closure operated at tertiary care centre

Authors: International Journal of Medical Science and Innovative Research (IJMSIR);

The closure debate: A prospective comparative study of mesh suture repair v/s Conventional mass closure operated at tertiary care centre

Abstract

Abstract Background: Traditionally, a laparotomy wound is closed as mass closure, where the fascial layers are closed with single suture. The optimal approach to abdominal wound closure has yet to be determined. Ideally it should be technically straightforward, simple, cost-efficient, reduced risk of immediate and long term complication ensuring equally effective outcomes regardless of whether it is performed by a trainee or an experienced surgeon. Recently, a new closure technique known as the mesh-sutured method has gained popularity and has shown reduced complications than conventional mass closure method. Aims and Objectives · To compare effectiveness of mesh sutured repair vs. conventional mass closure of midline laparotomy · To study feasibility and safety of mesh sutured repair. · To compare the occurrence of wound infection, dehiscence and early incisional hernia in conventional mass closure and mesh sutured repair. Setting and design: This study was performed in P.D.U. Government medical college and hospital, Rajkot (Gujarat) in patients undergoingmidline laparotomy, either planned or emergency. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients were enrolled in the study, with 50 undergoing conventional mass closure and the remaining 50 receiving closure using the mesh-sutured repair technique. Randomization was done by binary distribution to eliminate bias. Patients were monitored during the post-operative days for outcome of the procedure and complications such as wound infection, dehiscence and incisional hernia at regular interval. Results: This study had shown significantly less rate of infection, dehiscence and incisional hernia in mesh sutured repair as compared to conventional mass closure. Conclusion: This newer technique of mesh-sutured repair provides distinct advantages over the conventional mass closure method like lower incidence of wound infection and decreased rate of incisional hernia. However, the actual incidence of incisional hernia could not be accurately determined due to short duration of study and limited sample size.

Keywords

Abdominal Wall, Emergency, Incisional Hernia, Laparotomy, Macroporous

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!