Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Methodological Evaluation of Field Research Station Systems in Ethiopia Using Time-Series Forecasting Models for Efficiency Measurement

Authors: Demissie, Tadesse; Assefa, Gebru; Bulcha, Mekuria; Kifle, Yared;

Methodological Evaluation of Field Research Station Systems in Ethiopia Using Time-Series Forecasting Models for Efficiency Measurement

Abstract

Field research stations play a crucial role in agricultural development, particularly in resource-limited settings such as Ethiopia. However, their efficiency and impact are often subject to variability and require detailed evaluation. The methodology involves collecting and analysing data from multiple research stations over a period, employing time-series forecasting models such as ARIMA (AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average) to estimate efficiency gains. A significant proportion of the forecasted improvements in crop yields can be attributed to targeted interventions implemented by the research stations, indicating potential for enhancing agricultural productivity. The results suggest that time-series forecasting models provide valuable insights into the operational efficiency of field research stations, offering a robust framework for future evaluations and policy development. Further studies should consider incorporating additional variables to refine the model and ensure more accurate predictions of station performance. Field Research Stations, Efficiency Measurement, Time-Series Forecasting, ARIMA Model The empirical specification follows $Y=\beta_0+\beta^\top X+\varepsilon$, and inference is reported with uncertainty-aware statistical criteria.

Keywords

sustainability assessment, time series analysis, resource allocation, African development, yield optimization, econometrics, forecasting models

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!