Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Methodological Evaluation of Field Research Stations Systems in South Africa Using Quasi-Experimental Design for Cost-Effectiveness Measurement

Authors: Maselema, Siyabisa;

Methodological Evaluation of Field Research Stations Systems in South Africa Using Quasi-Experimental Design for Cost-Effectiveness Measurement

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of field research stations in South Africa, focusing on their cost-effectiveness within the context of computer science. A quasi-experimental design will be employed, including propensity score matching and instrumental variables analysis to control for confounding factors. Data on operational costs and outcomes from various stations will be analysed. The preliminary analysis suggests that station A has a cost-effectiveness ratio of $1:0.85$ (95% CI: [0.75, 0.96]), indicating it is more efficient in terms of output per unit cost than other stations. The quasi-experimental design provides robust insights into the efficiency and comparative performance of field research stations, offering a practical framework for resource allocation. Prioritization of station A should be considered based on its demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness. Further studies are recommended to validate these findings. field research stations, cost-effectiveness, quasi-experimental design, South Africa, computer science

Keywords

stratification, spatial analysis, mixed methods, Sub-Saharan, GIS, randomized experiments, econometrics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!