Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Patent . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Patent . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

# We Can Predict Which Layer Will Matter Most for Changing a Model's Next-Token Answer Before Running Any Intervention Sweep

Authors: Peña, Angel;

# We Can Predict Which Layer Will Matter Most for Changing a Model's Next-Token Answer Before Running Any Intervention Sweep

Abstract

Continuous Representations, Discrete Commitment: A Causal Threshold in Decoder-Only LLMs Correlational and interventional analyses of LLM internals appear to disagree: probes show gradual representational change across depth, while activation patching reveals sharp behavioral transitions. We resolve this by showing the two methods measure different properties. We perform layerwise residual-stream swaps with paired controls across three decoder-only architectures (GPT-2 Small, Gemma-2-2B, Qwen2.5-1.5B) and find a replicated causal commitment transition at 62–71% network depth. Below this threshold, swaps produce negligible behavioral change; at or above it, outputs flip immediately with large margin transfer. The transition is specific to the main intervention (not matched by random-norm, self, or position-shuffle controls) and stable across patch scales and random seeds in the two mid-size models. Representations evolve continuously. Causal commitment does not. The two findings are compatible once the distinction between representational change and output determination is made explicit. Code and evaluation notebooks are available in the companion repository. Keywords: mechanistic interpretability, activation patching, causal intervention, commitment threshold, decoder-only transformers

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!