Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 9 versions
addClaim

The Decalogy on Artificial Intelligence: Ten Papers in Four Movements

Abstract

This volume collects ten papers written in two phases. The first phase produced the Transition Trilogy (Papers 1–3): a foundation paper on the nature of human cognition, an empirical paper on disciplinary convergence under AI methodology, and a methodological paper on AI-assisted research. The second phase produced Papers 4–10: papers on the definition of AI, workflow, human value, the robot, physical substrates, the world as signal environment, and the Silicon Era. The ten papers argue toward three theses. Thesis One: the foundational definitions have been wrong — intelligence, AI, the robot, and the Silicon Era have all been defined as systems that exist separately from the world and bridge that separation through technology. All four definitions were wrong in the same direction. Correcting them changes the conclusions. Thesis Two: the transition is already underway. What appears to be a future state — AI as the epistemic core of every field, convergence of methodologies, the collapse of the power-access law — is a present condition. Thesis Three: AI does not separate humans from the world. It integrates them more deeply into it, and that integration is expansion. The three theses are not independent claims. They are the same insight at three angles: definitional (Thesis One), historical (Thesis Two), directional (Thesis Three). The Independence Illusion — the common error structure named in Paper 10 — is what all three theses correct. REVISION NOTES (v2): Revision v2 is a complete replacement of the prior version. All ten papers have been substantially rewritten. The argumentative architecture, evidential structure, formal apparatus, and terminology have been rebuilt. A detailed changelog is available from the author upon request.

Keywords

robotics, Learned Interaction Pipeline, human-AI integration, deficiency substrate, Fairpoint Principle, Independence Illusion, World Signal Sufficiency, artificial intelligence, Silicon Era, disciplinary convergence, Definitional Cascade, AI governance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!