Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Methodological Evaluation of Urban Primary Care Networks in Ghana: A Quasi-Experimental Design for Clinical Outcomes Measurement

Authors: Dankwa, Yaw; Gyamfi, Adwoa;

Methodological Evaluation of Urban Primary Care Networks in Ghana: A Quasi-Experimental Design for Clinical Outcomes Measurement

Abstract

Urban primary care networks (PCNs) in Ghana are essential for improving healthcare access and outcomes. However, their effectiveness is often underpinned by methodological challenges. A mixed-methods approach was employed, including quantitative data collection through standardised surveys and observational assessments. Data were analysed using linear regression models with robust standard errors to account for potential confounders. Analysis of the PCN systems revealed a significant improvement in patient satisfaction scores (mean score: 85/100) compared to baseline, suggesting effective network integration and service delivery enhancements. The quasi-experimental design provided robust evidence for the effectiveness of urban PCNs in Ghana, with notable improvements in clinical outcomes among patients. Further research should focus on scalability and sustainability of these networks across different geographical regions within Ghana. Urban primary care networks, Ghana, Methodological evaluation, Clinical outcomes, Quasi-experimental design Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.

Keywords

African Geography, Outcome Measurement, Community Health Models, Quasi-Experimental Design, Mixed-Methods Research, Primary Care Systems, Randomized Controlled Trials

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!