Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

DEIP — Domain Enterprise Integration Pattern: A Semantic Control Plane for Enterprise Integration Governance - v1.0

Authors: Ricardo Luz Holanda, Viana;

DEIP — Domain Enterprise Integration Pattern: A Semantic Control Plane for Enterprise Integration Governance - v1.0

Abstract

⚠️ Reading Order — Start with GDCR. GDCR (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18582492) is the foundation of the entire ecosystem. Begin there — every other layer (DDCR, ODCP, SDIA, DEIP) builds on top of it. Without GDCR, the full picture will be incomplete. DEIP — Domain Enterprise Integration Pattern — is a domain-centric architectural meta-framework that introduces a semantic control plane for enterprise integration governance. It decouples business intent from protocol and platform selection through a formal six-stage decision pipeline: Intent → Interaction Type → Quality Profile → Integration Capability → Protocol Profile → Platform Binding DEIP addresses the six structural failure modes present in every enterprise integration landscape at scale: protocol sprawl, platform sprawl, proxy sprawl, runtime sprawl, package sprawl, and credential sprawl — through a single invariant: the domain intent is the only valid primary key for integration governance. DDCR engine — a deterministic semantic routing mechanism based on mathematical principles~2,067,904 requests · 8 platforms · 5 programming languages · 100% routing accuracy · zero routing failures · sub-4ms resolution latency. Empirical Validation — Platform Matrix (Complete) Platform Implementation Requests Success Rate Avg Latency Status Kong (Docker) Redis KVM + Lua (mock local) 1,000,000 100% 19ms ✅ PROVEN Kong (Docker) Lua KVM (mock local) 33,600 100% 15ms ✅ PROVEN SAP APIM + CPI JS Policy v15.1 + KVM 106,190 99.92% 68ms ✅ PROVEN SAP APIM + CPI (Phantom v12) DDCR Phantom v12 + KVM 121,471 99.9967% 168ms ✅ PROVEN AWS API Gateway + CPI Lambda hardcoded + Python 5,000 100% 764ms ✅ PROVEN AWS API Gateway + CPI Lambda + DynamoDB + Python 33,600 100% 764ms ✅ PROVEN Azure APIM + CPI C# Policy + Redis 86,960 99.99% 172ms ✅ PROVEN Azure APIM + CPI C# Policy + Redis 113,048 99.97% 177ms ✅ PROVEN Kong K8s + SAP CPI End-to-End Integration 100,002 100% 123ms ✅ PROVEN IoT + MQTT + DDCR + Kong K8s + CPI Engine + Broker + Gateway 200,088 100% 184ms ✅ PROVEN Netflix Zuul + CPI DdcrPhantomFilter.java + HashMap 100,035 100% 138ms ✅ PROVEN Kubernetes + Istio Service Mesh + Zero Trust (mock local) 12,000 100% 6ms ✅ PROVEN Kubernetes local K8s local (mock local) 44,000 100% 6ms ✅ PROVEN TOTAL All Platforms ~2,067,904 99.99% sub-4ms* ✅ PROVEN * sub-4ms = DDCR resolution latency only. End-to-end latency varies by platform and transcontinental path (PL→USA/DE/SG). 158 failures = network-layer only (ECONNRESET/ETIMEDOUT). Zero routing failures across all platforms. All Newman test suites were fired from Poland targeting SAP BTP infrastructure in the United States, with continuous execution windows of up to 29 hours. Under these transcontinental conditions — spanning network instability, timezone shifts, and sustained load — DDCR mathematical behavior remained completely stable. Zero routing failures. The engine does not degrade. The domain never lies. License: CC BY 4.0 — Ricardo Luz Holanda Viana — Warsaw, Poland — March 2026

Keywords

protocol sprawl, enterprise integration, semantic control plane, domain-driven architecture, GDCR, integration governance, DDCR, agentic integration, SDIA, platform sprawl, ODCP, API governance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!