Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Diversité et performance économique des exploitations de production de tomates dans les régions du Kadiogo et de l'Oubri du Burkina Faso

Authors: SEDOGO Alexandra Carine Marlyne; ZIDOUEMBA Patrice Rélouendé; OUEDRAOGO Souleymane;

Diversité et performance économique des exploitations de production de tomates dans les régions du Kadiogo et de l'Oubri du Burkina Faso

Abstract

RESUME La filière tomate joue un rôle important dans le développement socio-économique. Cependant, l’hétérogénéité des pratiques engendre des écarts de rentabilité entre exploitations. Cette étude analyse les performances économiques des producteurs de tomates dans la région du Kadiogo et de l’Oubri au Burkina Faso. Au total, 292 producteurs ont été enquêtés à partir de la méthode boule de neige. Les données traitées à partir de Stata 16 et R ont permis de réaliser une typologie des producteurs à partir d’une analyse factorielle de données mixtes (AFDM) et une classification ascendante hiérarchisée (CAH) et d’établir un compte d’exploitation. Les résultats révèlent trois systèmes de production. Le système traditionnel est caractérisé par un rendement estimé à 15,3 t/ha et une marge nette relative de 7.542.452FCFA. Le système semi intensif se distingue par un rendement élevé de 18,5 t/ha et une marge nette relative estimée à 10.910.595 FCFA. Le système intensif affiche un rendement de 17,9 t/ha et une marge nette relative moins importante de 10.275.243 FCFA. Ces résultats indiquent que le système semi intensif est économiquement le plus performant, en raison de l’utilisation rationnelle des facteurs de production. Globalement, la production de tomate est rentable dans l’ensemble des systèmes identifiés. Par conséquent, l’amélioration de la compétitivité de la filière nécessite des politiques différenciées selon le type d’exploitations ainsi qu’un renforcement ciblé des capacités techniques des exploitations. Mots clés : tomate, système de production, rentabilité, performance, Burkina Faso ABSTRACT The tomato sector plays a significant role in socio-economic development. However, the heterogeneity of farming practices leads to profitability disparities between farms. This study analyzes the economic performance of tomato producers in the Kadiogo and Oubri regions of Burkina Faso. A total of 292 producers were surveyed using the snowball sampling method. Data processed using Stata 16 and R allowed for the creation of a producer typology based on mixed data factor analysis (MDFA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), and the development of a farm account. The results reveal three production systems. The traditional system is characterized by an estimated yield of 15.3 t/ha and a relative net margin of 7,542,452 FCFA. The semi-intensive system is distinguished by a high yield of 18.5 t/ha and an estimated relative net margin of 10,910,595 FCFA. The intensive system yielded 17.9 t/ha and a relatively lower net margin of 10,275,243 FCFA. These results indicate that the semi-intensive system is the most economically efficient, due to the rational use of production factors. Overall, tomato production is profitable across all identified systems. Therefore, improving the sector's competitiveness requires differentiated policies based on farm type, as well as targeted capacity building for farms. Keywords : tomato, production system, profitability, performance, Burkina Faso

Keywords

African Scientific Journal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!