Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Power-Distribution Equipment Systems in Tanzania: Methodological Validation Through Randomized Field Trial

Authors: Samata, Kamase; Mwita, Mwangi; Kinyanjui, John;

Power-Distribution Equipment Systems in Tanzania: Methodological Validation Through Randomized Field Trial

Abstract

Power distribution equipment systems (PDES) are critical for reliable electricity supply in Tanzania's rural areas. A randomized field trial was conducted to evaluate the reliability of PDES, employing statistical models to quantify risks. The trial results showed that PDES with redundancy features reduced power outages by approximately 20% compared to non-redundant systems. The study confirms the efficacy of incorporating redundancy in PDES for enhanced reliability and risk reduction. Implementing these findings could lead to more resilient power grids, reducing costs and improving service delivery in Tanzania's rural regions. Power Distribution Equipment Systems, Randomized Field Trial, Risk Reduction, Engineering The maintenance outcome was modelled as $Y_{it}=\beta_0+\beta_1X_{it}+u_i+\varepsilon_{it}$, with robustness checked using heteroskedasticity-consistent errors.

Keywords

FieldEvaluation, ReliabilityAssessment, AfricanGeography, Sub-Saharan, Randomization, SystemsAnalysis, QuantitativeResearch

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!