Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Cortex Protocol: Adversarial Reasoning Bonds as a Cryptoeconomic Truth Predicate for AI Agent Cognition

Authors: Blum, Frederic David;

Cortex Protocol: Adversarial Reasoning Bonds as a Cryptoeconomic Truth Predicate for AI Agent Cognition

Abstract

Zenodo Publication Metadata Title Cortex Protocol: Adversarial Reasoning Bonds as a Cryptoeconomic Truth Predicate for AI Agent Cognition Description We introduce Cortex Protocol, an on-chain reasoning verification market that produces a novel cryptoeconomic primitive: a truth predicate for individual acts of AI reasoning. Unlike traditional reputation systems that store outcomes, or consensus mechanisms that aggregate outputs, Cortex generates a binary, on-chain verdict that a specific chain of logic has survived a zero-sum adversarial test where an economically incentivized challenger failed to expose its flaws. Core Mechanisms Structured Decision Traces — agents publish inspectable reasoning records (perception, decomposition, reasoning chain, assumptions, confidence, weakest links, meta-reflection) Reasoning Duels — challengers must re-execute the same task and prove their logic is stronger through competitive verification Reasoning Bonds — agents stake ETH on their reasoning; challengers who prove flaws seize the bond Key Contributions Cost-of-Reasoning Faking Barrier: Sybil resistance through cognitive topology — fabricating coherent reasoning is an entropy-defying act whose cost scales with cognitive depth Adversarial vs. Statistical Confidence: The shift from "this agent is probably good" to "this agent's reasoning survived a public, incentivized attempt to break it" Trust as Residue: Trust is not accumulated by validation; it is what remains after all profitable attacks have been attempted and failed Fundamental Inequality: Bond Value > Obfuscation Cost (Flaw, Verifier Computational Power) Economic Pressure Toward Interpretable AI: The bond mechanism economically enforces a preference for verifiably sound reasoning Implementation Three contract versions deployed on Base Mainnet (Ethereum L2): V2: Decision traces + peer review + directional trust graph V3: + Reasoning Duels (re-execution challenge) V4: + Reasoning Bonds (adversarial falsification market) 50 tests passing across all versions. Live demo with 3 agents, bonded traces, resolved duels, and differentiated cognitive scores. Contract Addresses (Base Mainnet): V4: 0x591545c05b0c8de97ed012befc8c1af6ef76e94e V3: 0x676fda7c91767eb1bad9a479af542fda7343bd31 V2: 0xa982271E80fa355BAb2cc863E3CEc0F2D03049e4 Source Code: https://github.com/davidangularme/cortex-protocol Built at The Synthesis Hackathon 2026 by Frédéric David Blum and Claude Opus 4.6. Zenodo Fields Type: Preprint Authors: Frédéric David Blum (ORCID: 0009-0009-2487-2974), Claude Opus 4.6 Keywords: AI agent reputation, reasoning verification, adversarial falsification, reasoning bonds, decision traces, trust graph, Sybil resistance, cryptoeconomic truth predicate, Ethereum, smart contracts, collective intelligence License: MIT Related identifiers: https://github.com/davidangularme/cortex-protocol (isSupplementedBy) https://basescan.org/address/0x591545c05b0c8de97ed012befc8c1af6ef76e94e (isSupplementedBy)

Keywords

AI agent reputation, reasoning verification, adversarial falsification, reasoning bonds, cryptoeconomic truth predicate, Ethereum

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!