Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Ethical Dilemmas in Egyptian Archaeology and Repatriation Practices: An African Perspective Comparative Study

Authors: Abdelfattah, Salah; El-Gamal, Ahmed;

Ethical Dilemmas in Egyptian Archaeology and Repatriation Practices: An African Perspective Comparative Study

Abstract

Egyptian archaeology has faced significant ethical dilemmas regarding repatriation of artifacts to their countries of origin and indigenous communities. The research employs a comparative analysis approach, drawing from archival data, interviews with archaeologists and representatives of indigenous communities, and scholarly literature to explore divergent perspectives on ethical conduct in Egyptian archaeological contexts. A notable finding is the disparity in how artifacts are classified (as national heritage versus local property) between Egypt's Ministry of Antiquities and indigenous groups, leading to conflicts over repatriation rights. The study highlights the need for a more nuanced approach that respects both international legal frameworks and cultural sensitivities of affected communities. Archaeological practices should incorporate community consultation processes early in project planning stages, ensuring equitable decision-making on artifact management and repatriation. Egyptian archaeology, ethical dilemmas, repatriation, indigenous communities, comparative study

Keywords

Postcolonial Theory, Ethnography, Indigenous Rights, Egypt, Repatriation, Colonialism, Heritage Management

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!