
0.85–1.00 m below top of Pliocene deposits: Glottidia? sp., 24 fragments, RGM.793911 50–51m below surface: Glottidia? sp., 7 fragments, RGM.1309921 7.0– 7.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 22 fragments, RGM.793808 Zenderen Member: 7.5–8.0 m: Glottidia? sp., > 30 fragments, RGM.793809 8.0– 8.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 5 fragments, RGM.793810 8.5–9.0 m: Glottidia? sp., 5 fragments, RGM.793811 9.0– 9.5 m: Glottidia? sp.,> 30 fragments, RGM.793812 9.5–10.0 m: Glottidia? sp., 12 fragments, RGM.793813 10.0– 10.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 6 fragments, RGM.793814 10.5–11.0 m: Glottidia? sp., 7 fragments, RGM.793815 Neede (Gelderland), borehole Gelselaarsbrug (B34B0175) (old name Neede II, 34B.3–1), 52.164278 N, 6.549397 E, Early Pliocene, Breda Formation, Delden and Zenderen Members, collected by M. van den Bosch, 30 October 1970. Borehole 34B.3–1 was described in detail and the section of the borehole was illustrated by VAN DEN BOSCH et al. (1975, Fig. 12); Lingula specimens and Lingula fragments were mentioned along the section. Delden Member: 32.5–33.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 6 fragments, RGM.793769 33.5–34.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 8 fragments, RGM.793770 34.5–35.5 m: Glottidia? sp.,> 10 fragments, RGM.793771 35.5–36.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 1 fragment, RGM.793772 36.5–37.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 4 fragments, RGM.793773 37.5–38.5 m: Glottidia? sp.,> 10 fragments, RGM.793774 38.5–39.5 m: Glottidia? sp.,> 10 fragments, RGM.793775 39.5–40.5 m: Glottidia? sp.,> 10 fragments, RGM.793776 40.5–41.5 m: Glottidia? sp.,> 10 fragments, RGM.793777 41.5–42.5 m: Glottidia? sp.,> 10 fragments, RGM.793778 42.5–43.5 m: Glottidia? sp.,> 10 fragments, RGM.793779 43.5–45.5 m: Glottidia? sp.,> 10 fragments, RGM.793780 45.5–46.5 m: Glottidia? sp.,> 10 fragments, RGM.793781 46.5–47.5 m: Glottidia? sp.,> 10 fragments, RGM.793782 47.5–48.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 3 fragments, RGM.793783 48.5–49.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 2 fragments, RGM.793784 Zenderen Member: 49.5–50.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 2 fragments, RGM.793785 50.5–51.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 1 fragment, RGM.793786 51.5–52.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 1 fragment, RGM.793787 52.5–53.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 3 fragments, RGM.793788 53.5–54.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 1 fragment, RGM.793789 54.5–55.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 4 fragments, RGM.793790 55.5–56.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 3 fragments, RGM.793791 56.5–58.0 m: Glottidia? sp., 2 fragments, RGM.793792 58.0–59.0 m: Glottidia? sp., 2 fragments, RGM.793793 59.0–60.0 m: Glottidia? sp., 2 fragments, RGM.793794 60.0– 61.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 3 fragments, RGM.793795 61.5–62.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 6 fragments, RGM.793796 62.5–63.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 2 fragments, RGM.793797 64.5–66.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 1 fragment, RGM.793798 66.5–67.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 1 fragment, RGM.793799 67.5–68.5 m: Glottidia? sp., 1 fragment, RGM.793800 Glottidia? sp. Material – Gedgrave (24 fragments); Cricqueville-en-Bessin (2 fragments); Kreekrak (7 fragments); Delden (Delden Member: 22 fragments, Zenderen Member:> 95 fragments); Neede (Delden Member:> 124 fragments; Zenderen Member: 35 fragments). Remarks – Several samples from the Pliocene of England, France and the Netherlands yielded indeterminable Lingulidae fragments. The small size of the fragments makes it impossible to decide whether they belong to Lingula or Glottidia. Until now, only Glottidia has surely been confirmed from the Neogene of the North Sea Basin (e.g. CHUANG 1964; DULAI 2013), therefore, Glottidia is used for these fragments with question mark.
Published as part of Dulai, Alfréd, 2016, Sporadic Pliocene and Pleistocene brachiopods in Naturalis Biodiversity Center (Leiden, the Netherlands): Records from the Mediterranean, and the North Sea Basin, pp. 65-98 in Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 33 on pages 71-79, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2016.33.65, http://zenodo.org/record/18611743
Lingulidae, Glottidia, Lingulida, Brachiopoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Lingulata, Taxonomy
Lingulidae, Glottidia, Lingulida, Brachiopoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Lingulata, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
