Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Community-Initiated Water Management Platforms in Urban Ugandan Communities,

Authors: Onyango, Okello; Lucy, Ssekakiime; Kizza, Mugisha;

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Community-Initiated Water Management Platforms in Urban Ugandan Communities,

Abstract

Community-initiated water management platforms have emerged as a critical strategy for improving access to clean drinking water in urban settings of Uganda. A mixed-methods approach was employed, including surveys, focus group discussions, and case studies in selected urban communities to gather data on platform usage, community engagement, and financial sustainability indicators. The analysis revealed a significant disparity in adoption rates across different socio-economic groups, with higher-income areas showing greater uptake of the platforms. A key theme identified was the perceived benefits of hygiene education and water treatment as major motivators for participation. While initial investment costs were substantial, the long-term economic and health benefits suggest that targeted interventions could maximise cost-effectiveness by addressing specific community needs such as infrastructure improvements and educational resources. Communities with lower adoption rates should prioritise education campaigns and financial incentives to encourage wider participation. Urban planners should allocate additional resources towards supporting these platforms in underserved areas, particularly focusing on improving access for vulnerable populations. Water Management Platforms, Community Engagement, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Urban Development, Uganda

Keywords

African Geography, Water Resource Management, Sustainability Studies, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Community Development, Participatory Methods, Urbanization Processes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!