
Southern Africa's Mozambique has experienced significant political transitions from traditional governance structures to modern democratic systems. This study aims to explore how these changes have affected societal outcomes and institutional development. This research employs both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Qualitative data are gathered through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, while quantitative data are collected via structured surveys. A mixed methods framework is used to triangulate findings from both approaches. Findings indicate a significant shift in societal stability with approximately 70% of respondents expressing improved legal frameworks post-transition, though challenges related to traditional leadership continuities remain evident. The study underscores the complex interplay between tradition and modern democracy in Mozambique. It highlights both advancements and ongoing challenges that necessitate further policy development and institutional support. Recommendations include enhancing traditional leadership training for contemporary democratic integration, strengthening legal education programmes to ensure compliance with new frameworks, and fostering inclusive dialogue spaces for citizen participation. Traditional Governance, Modern Democracy, Mozambique, Mixed Methods Study
Cross-Sectional Studies, Quantitative Data Analysis, Traditional Institutions, Mozambique, Qualitative Research, Modernization, Participatory Methods
Cross-Sectional Studies, Quantitative Data Analysis, Traditional Institutions, Mozambique, Qualitative Research, Modernization, Participatory Methods
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
