
在朱良劫灾递归范式框架下,本文系统地追溯了“递归”概念的思想历史,并严格将其与莱布尼茨的“单子论”进行比较。我们证明了单子论是关于世界基本单位的前现代哲学猜想,其核心洞见——内在活力、不可分割性和自我目的——在朱良范式中被数学形式化和动态实现。然而,存在根本且不可通约的差异:单子基于形而上学的前提和预设的和谐,而递归子必然源自元事实,并通过熵减少选择实现因果耦合;Monad 是封闭的“无窗口”实体,递归是开放的“强耦合”网络节点;单子的演化是一个线性展开,而递归通过大灾难公理实现递归转移。递归子不是现代的单子论版本,而是对其核心问题的元理论回应,标志着从“预设和谐”向“减少熵的自洽性”的范式转变。
Leibniz; monadology; recursor; causal network; entropy-reducing metabolism; pre-established harmony
Leibniz; monadology; recursor; causal network; entropy-reducing metabolism; pre-established harmony
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
