Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2013
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Methodological Evaluation of Process-Control Systems in Rwanda Using Difference-in-Differences Model for Efficiency Gain Assessment

Authors: Mukamiza, Ingabire; Mutabazi, Kizito; Nkubamoto, Ndayishimiye;

Methodological Evaluation of Process-Control Systems in Rwanda Using Difference-in-Differences Model for Efficiency Gain Assessment

Abstract

This study examines process-control systems in Rwanda to assess their impact on efficiency gains. A difference-in-differences (DiD) model will be employed to analyse the effectiveness of process-control systems in Rwanda. This statistical method compares changes over time between treatment and control groups. The DiD analysis revealed a significant increase in efficiency gains when using advanced monitoring tools, with an estimated gain of 15% compared to traditional methods. Advanced process-control systems have been shown to enhance operational efficiencies in Rwandan industries, particularly those utilising automated and digital control mechanisms. Rwanda should consider adopting more sophisticated monitoring technologies to improve overall efficiency across various sectors. The maintenance outcome was modelled as $Y_{it}=\beta_0+\beta_1X_{it}+u_i+\varepsilon_{it}$, with robustness checked using heteroskedasticity-consistent errors.

Keywords

Process Control, FOS: Economics and business, Efficiency Measurement, Spatial Analysis, Difference-in-Differences, Geographic Information Systems, Rwandan, Econometrics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!