Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Quality of Life among University Teachers: A Study of Faculty Members of Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Bihar

Authors: Praween, Dr. Tabassum;

Quality of Life among University Teachers: A Study of Faculty Members of Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Bihar

Abstract

The quality of life of university teachers has gained increasing attention in contemporary educational research, as the professional effectiveness, productivity, and academic engagement of faculty members are closely associated with their overall well-being. The present study aimed to examine the level of quality of life among university teachers and to analyse the differences across gender and locality among faculty members of Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga, Bihar. The study adopted a descriptive survey research design to explore various dimensions of teachers’ quality of life. A total of 600 university teachers were selected through convenience sampling, comprising 300 male and 300 female faculty members from different departments and affiliated colleges of the university. The sample also included an equal representation of 300 urban and 300 rural teachers to facilitate locality-based comparison. Data were collected using the WHOQOL-BREF Scale developed by the World Health Organization, which measures four major domains of quality of life: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental health. The reliability of the instrument was established using Cronbach’s alpha, yielding a coefficient of 0.91, indicating high internal consistency and suitability of the scale for the present investigation. The collected data were analysed using descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests. The findings revealed that the overall quality of life of university teachers was at a moderate level. Among the various dimensions, environmental health and social relationships demonstrated relatively higher levels, whereas psychological health was comparatively lower. The results further indicated significant differences in quality of life across gender and locality, suggesting that both personal and contextual factors influence the well-being of faculty members. The study highlights the importance of developing supportive institutional policies, strengthening psychological support systems, and improving working conditions to enhance the overall quality of life of university teachers. Improving teachers’ well-being may ultimately contribute to better teaching effectiveness, higher academic productivity, and the sustainable development of higher education institutions.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!