Ascendimacy: The formal structure — Definitions, new vocabulary, positioning, and honest limits
Ascendimacy: The formal structure — Definitions, new vocabulary, positioning, and honest limits
Paper #2 in the Ascendimacy series. Available in Portuguese (original) and English (translation). This paper formalizes the theory introduced in Paper #1: formal definition of transcendence, positioning against Sen's Capabilities Approach (1999), Taleb's antifragility (2012), and Suchman's organizational legitimacy (1995), a bidimensional force field model (D-force vs T-force), and honest acknowledgment of current limitations including the absence of a timing instrument for selectively repressive systems. Artigo #2 da série Ascendimacy. Disponível em português (original) e inglês (tradução). ascendimacy.com
organizational legitimacy, capabilities approach, antifragility, registered predictions, tectonização, falsifiable social theory, power legitimacy, force field model, degralização, Ascendimacy
organizational legitimacy, capabilities approach, antifragility, registered predictions, tectonização, falsifiable social theory, power legitimacy, force field model, degralização, Ascendimacy
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!