
This article examines the consequences of overrelying on Artificial Intelligence in higher education. Quantitative data from 157 participants reveals a "Blind Spot Paradox": while 100% of students acknowledge AI harms critical thinking, 85.7% use it for homework. Only 14.3% admit personal overreliance, indicating a false sense of autonomy. Empirical evidence, including EEG studies, shows that AI dependency creates "cognitive debt" and weakens neural connectivity. Furthermore, AI users demonstrate lower cognitive engagement, becoming "lazy thinkers". ESP instructors report significant skill degradation in autonomous problem-solving and writing. To mitigate these risks and safeguard academic integrity, the research advocates for reintroducing traditional proctored examinations. Ultimately, balancing technological efficiency with intellectual autonomy is essential to prevent long-term cognitive erosion.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
