Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Employment Dynamics: Evaluating the Balance Between Job Displacement and Job Creation

Authors: Palake, Uday;

Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Employment Dynamics: Evaluating the Balance Between Job Displacement and Job Creation

Abstract

Abstract The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has reignited a longstanding economic debate concerning technological unemployment and labor market transformation. While historical technological revolutions have ultimately generated net employment gains, AI differs in its capacity to automate not only routine manual tasks but also cognitive and decision-based functions. This paper examines the net employment effects of AI by analyzing the balance between job displacement and job creation across sectors. It evaluates whether AI primarily substitutes human labor or complements it by enhancing productivity and generating new occupational categories. The study adopts a labor economics framework grounded in skill-biased technological change and structural transformation theory. It argues that AI disproportionately displaces routine and middle-skill occupations while increasing demand for high-skill, technology-intensive roles. Simultaneously, AI fosters indirect employment through new industries, platform ecosystems, and productivity-induced demand expansion. However, the temporal mismatch between displacement and creation produces transitional unemployment and wage polarization. The paper further assesses sectoral heterogeneity, highlighting differential impacts in manufacturing, services, and knowledge industries. It also examines developing economies where informal labor dominance and limited reskilling infrastructure may intensify adverse outcomes. The findings suggest that net employment effects are not technologically predetermined but institutionally mediated. Education systems, labor mobility, industrial policy, and social protection mechanisms play decisive roles in shaping outcomes. The analysis concludes that AI is unlikely to produce permanent mass unemployment at the aggregate level but will significantly restructure labor markets. The critical policy challenge is not preventing automation but managing distributional consequences and accelerating workforce adaptation to ensure inclusive growth.

Keywords

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI); Technological Unemployment; Job Displacement; Job Creation; Net Employment Effect; Skill-Biased Technological Change; Labor Market Polarization; Structural Transformation; Automation; Human Capital; Wage Inequality; Productivity Growth; Institutional Adaptation; Digital Economy; Economic Policy.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green