Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

UMST Research Dashboard : Foundations of Constitutional Physics — Progress Report

Authors: Shenbagamoorthy, Santosh Prabhu; Shyamsundar, Santhosh;

UMST Research Dashboard : Foundations of Constitutional Physics — Progress Report

Abstract

Research dashboard for the Foundations of Constitutional Physics (FCP) programme — provably safe AI for physical-world applications, grounded in the Clausius-Duhem inequality. This 29-page technical report documents five studies (FCP-I through FCP-V) covering architecture, empirical validation, formal verification, and deployment status as of March 2026. Highlights FCP-I Physics-Gated AI 100% thermodynamic admissibility on 16,146 samples · 2.99 MPa MAE · 785× faster than H-PINN Submitted. Preprint: doi:10.5281/zenodo.18768547 FCP-II Epistemic Sensing 60% measurement reduction · 88% timing-error improvement · 18,146 samples × 8 material families Submitted. Preprint: doi:10.5281/zenodo.18894710 FCP-III–V Working drafts — not yet submitted for peer review Verification & Implementation Formal verification — 59 sorry-free Lean 4 theorems · zero Coq Admitteds · complete Agda formalisation · 13 Haskell QuickCheck propertiesgithub.com/tytolabs/umst-formal Rust kernel — 27,542 LOC Rust/WASM physics engine with ROS2 bridgegithub.com/tytolabs/umst-prototype-2a FCP-I and FCP-II are publicly available as Zenodo preprints and have been submitted for peer review. FCP-III through FCP-V are working drafts not yet submitted. This is a living document; all claims are subject to revision.

Keywords

Constitutional AI, Unified Material-State Tensors, Formal verification, Thermodynamic admissibility, Physics-gated AI,, Epistemic sensing, Lean 4, DUMSTO, UMST, Material characterization, Construction robotics, Clausius-Duhem inequality, Category theory

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!