
This article examines the Uzbek translation of Jack London’s novel Martin Eden, focusing on the mistakes that occur due to misapplication of translation transformations. The analysis identifies common problems such as misinterpreted idioms, stylistic leveling, simplification of philosophical passages, neutralization of irony, and calque errors. Selected examples demonstrate how semantic, stylistic, and pragmatic adequacy is weakened in translation. Drawing on translation theory by Salomov, Komissarov, Barkhudarov, and Schweizer, the study emphasizes the importance of functional equivalents, compensation strategies, and stylistic sensitivity. The findings suggest that to preserve the novel’s intellectual depth and social critique, translators must go beyond literal rendering and ensure pragmatic and cultural adequacy.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
