This book reconstructs critique beyond its juridical image. Beginning with Kant’s question of legitimacy and passing through Maimon, Hölderlin, and Deleuze, it argues that thought does not begin from harmony, recognition, or ready-made faculties, but from asymmetry, sign, encounter, discord, and problem. Its central claim is that critique must be reformulated as a topology of admissibility. The decisive question is no longer only what makes thought possible in general, but under what local regime a thought-event becomes passable as thought at all. On this basis, the book develops a transition from conditions of possibility to regimes of admissibility, and from there toward a formalizable account of recursive modulation, threshold, passage, and local stabilization. The result is a philosophical framework in which critique becomes the analysis of selective passage rather than the tribunal of already constituted cognition. Thought is treated not as a right, but as an event. 82-page philosophical monograph with conceptual diagrams, appendices on admissibility and formalization, and a glossary of key terms. Keywords Kant, Deleuze, critique, admissibility, topology of thought, asymmetry, problematic field, Recursio Intensitatis, PQF, transcendental philosophy, forced thought