Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Quantitative Predictions for Non-Local Brain Correlations from a Fractional Field Model

Authors: Freeman, Carlos W.;

Quantitative Predictions for Non-Local Brain Correlations from a Fractional Field Model

Abstract

We derive seven falsifiable predictions for the transferred potential (correlated brain activity between isolated individuals) from a fractional non-local field model with α = 1.2. The model is calibrated against existing replication data (Radin 2004, r = 0.20 at 10m, p = 0.0005) and predicts: (1) power-law distance decay with exponent −1.8; (2) preferential low-frequency transfer (δ/γ ≈ 7:1); (3) sigmoidal meditation onset with sharp threshold; (4) electromagnetic shielding transparency; (5) bidirectional symmetry (novel, never tested); (6) distance-independent transfer latency (novel, never tested); (7) null effect for non-bonded pairs. A two-regime distance model predicts that correlations decay locally but persist at a constant floor beyond a coherence length of 1,000–10,000 km — explaining Grinberg-Zylberbaum's planned intercontinental experiment. Connections to recent demonstrations of room-temperature quantum coherence in fractal gels and to orchestrated objective reduction (Orch-OR) are discussed. Pre-registered predictions deposited at DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18823295.

Keywords

brain correlations, transferred potential, Orch-OR, non-local correlations, fractional Laplacian, EEG, Grinberg-Zylberbaum, consciousness, fractional field theory

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!