
Abstract Generative artificial intelligence systems increasingly rely on large-scale datasets that may contain substantial volumes of synthetic or machine-generated content. Research has demonstrated that recursive training on synthetic outputs can degrade diversity, distort statistical distributions, and contribute to model collapse. The Synthetic Data Contamination Index (SDCI) provides a standardized, model-agnostic framework for quantifying contamination risk within training corpora before model training begins. The index evaluates five measurable dimensions: synthetic ratio, recursive generation depth, provenance confidence, linguistic homogenization, and human anchor deficit. These variables are combined into a single normalized score (0-100), enabling direct comparison across datasets and supporting pre-training governance decision Introduction The rapid expansion of generative artificial intelligence has introduced a structural risk in training data pipelines. When models are trained on outputs produced by other models, recursive contamination may emerge. This process gradually reduces statistical diversity, removes rare patterns from distributions, and can ultimately lead to model collapse. Keywords Artificial Intelligence Governance, Synthetic Data Contamination, Model Collapse, Training Data Integrity, Dataset Governance, Machine Learning Risk Metrics, Provenance, Human Anchor Data, AI Safety.
Model Collapse, training data integrity, Synthetic Data Contamination, Recursive Training, Data Provenance, Dataset Governance, AI Safety, Machine Learning Risk Metrics, Human Anchor Data, AI governance
Model Collapse, training data integrity, Synthetic Data Contamination, Recursive Training, Data Provenance, Dataset Governance, AI Safety, Machine Learning Risk Metrics, Human Anchor Data, AI governance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
