Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Systemic Review on Herbal Medicines and Advances in Standardization of Herbal Drug and Herbal Drug Technology

Authors: Sanika Mote*, Sanika Mali, Sushant Mohite, Sayama Nadaf, Alfiya Mujawar, Om Niprul, Suraj Jadhav, Dr. Bhagyesh Janugade;

A Systemic Review on Herbal Medicines and Advances in Standardization of Herbal Drug and Herbal Drug Technology

Abstract

Herbal medicines, rooted in traditional systems like Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese Medicine, and Unani, have surged in popularity amid growing interest in complementary therapies. Yet, their integration into modern healthcare faces hurdles from inconsistent quality, safety, and efficacy due to variable raw materials and processing. This systematic review examines herbal medicine's current landscape, spotlighting standardization as key to therapeutic reliability. It covers techniques such as chromatographic fingerprinting, marker-based quantification, physicochemical profiling, and DNA barcoding. Modern innovations like nanotechnology, phytosomes, and bioenhancers improve drug delivery and bioavailability. The discussion extends to diverse global regulatory frameworks and cutting-edge analytical tools. Ultimately, blending scientific advancements with traditional wisdom promises safe, effective herbal therapeutics. Broadly, drug standardization ensures performance consistency, public health protection, regulatory compliance, and trust in pharmaceuticals—while supporting research integrity, trial reproducibility, and scalable biotech production.

Keywords

Herbal medicine , Standardization , Herbal drug technology , Quality control , Regulatory guidelines , Nanotechnology in herbal drugs

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!