
Reproducible machine learning pipeline for cardiovascular disease risk classification (n=68,630) comparing logistic regression and gradient-boosted models (XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest) with SHAP-based explainability, decision curve analysis, restricted cubic spline modeling, and subgroup validation.
If you use this software, please cite it.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
