Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

¿Realmente tenemos solo cinco sentidos? Una revisión de los sistemas sensoriales humanos

Authors: Benitez Granados, Fabian Eduardo;

¿Realmente tenemos solo cinco sentidos? Una revisión de los sistemas sensoriales humanos

Abstract

La idea de que los seres humanos poseen únicamente cinco sentidos —vista, oído, olfato, gusto y tacto— ha permanecido durante siglos como una explicación simplificada de la percepción humana. Sin embargo, los avances en neurociencia y fisiología han demostrado que la experiencia sensorial del organismo es considerablemente más compleja e involucra múltiples sistemas especializados de detección y regulación.Investigaciones contemporáneas han identificado diversos sistemas sensoriales adicionales relacionados con la percepción del equilibrio, la posición corporal, el dolor y el estado fisiológico interno del organismo. Estos sistemas incluyen modalidades como la propiocepción, la nocicepción y la interocepción, que desempeñan funciones fundamentales en la regulación de la homeostasis y la adaptación del cuerpo al entorno.Este artículo presenta una revisión conceptual de algunos de los principales sistemas sensoriales humanos reconocidos por la investigación neurocientífica, con el objetivo de ampliar la comprensión tradicional de los sentidos humanos y promover una visión más integrada de la percepción corporal.

Keywords

percepción humana sistemas sensoriales propiocepción interocepción nocicepción sistema vestibular neuropsicología

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!