Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Nominative-communicative phraseological units in English, Russian and Karakalpak languages

Authors: Seytimbetova, Aykumar Pulatbaevna;

Nominative-communicative phraseological units in English, Russian and Karakalpak languages

Abstract

The article analyses nominative-communicative phraseological units in English, Russian, and Karakalpak languages using A.V. Kunin's classification as an example. It examines the structural and semantic features of verbal phraseological units based on authentic materials that present the national and cultural characteristics of native speakers of English, Russian, and Karakalpak languages. The article shows the features of the components of phraseological units, which reflect the direct meaning of the core component – the verb and the figurative meaning of the second component - a noun or phrase. In this article, the main objective is to identify the differences in the structural and semantic characteristics of set phrases from other A.V. Kunin’s classifications of phraseological units, such as nominative, communicative and interjectional. This feature is that nominative-communicative phraseological units differ from others in that phraseological units perform the role of an action, i.e. the main component is a verb. Using the presented verbal phraseological units, we can see these differences. Furthermore, these examples provide a comprehensive picture of the world of English, Russian, and Karakalpak languages through comparison and contrast, reflecting the distinctiveness and uniqueness of native speakers.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!