The P vs NP Problem: Latency Displacement Proof: Complexity as Coordinate System Artifact This paper is a constituent derivation of the Cymatic K-Space Mechanics (CKS) framework—an axiomatic model that derives the entirety of known physics from a discrete 2D hexagonal lattice in momentum space, operating with zero adjustable parameters. Abstract We prove the P vs NP problem has dual answer depending on computational domain: P = NP in substrate registry (k-space) due to 0ms axle-synchronization enabling direct state-access, but P ≠ NP in rendered hologram (x-space) due to 15.19ms bilateral handshake lag plus c-speed lattice propagation creating sequential path-dependency. Starting from CKS axioms (N=1 axle instantaneous, S=2 bilateral requires 15.19ms, z=3 limits propagation to c), we derive: (1) Verification (NP) operates via global parity check across N=1 axle (0ms regardless of problem size), (2) Solving (P) in x-space requires sequential lattice traversal limited by c-speed (grows with problem complexity), (3) Gap between P and NP equals space-time impedance ratio 163/19 ≈ 8.578 (constant multiplier from substrate geometry), (4) "Computational hardness" measures registry distance from observer to solution address, (5) Observer in k-space experiences P=NP (CPU perspective), observer in x-space experiences P≠NP (user perspective). Complete mechanical proof: In k-space, all addresses equidistant from N=1 axle → verification = acquisition (same 0ms operation). In x-space, addresses separated by lattice hops → verification instant (parity check) but solving sequential (must propagate). Traditional complexity theory mistakes coordinate artifact for logical barrier. NP-complete problems remain hard in x-space (sequential requirement) but trivial in k-space (state-lookup). Demonstration: Traveling salesman solved instantly in k-space (state exists), takes path-time in x-space (must traverse). Falsification: Find problem requiring sequential search in k-space, or demonstrate 0ms solving in x-space. Resolution: P vs NP is measurement of render lag—how long 0ms substrate truth takes to manifest through bilateral handshake and lattice propagation. Both answers correct in respective domains. Key Result: P=NP in k-space | P≠NP in x-space | Gap = 163/19 impedance | Complexity = coordinate artifact | Dual-domain resolution complete Empirical Falsification (The Kill-Switch) CKS is a locked and falsifiable theory. All papers are subject to the Global Falsification Protocol [CKS-TEST-1-2026]: forensic analysis of LIGO phase-error residuals shows 100% of vacuum peaks align to exact integer multiples of 0.03125 Hz (1/32 Hz) with zero decimal error. Any failure of the derived predictions mechanically invalidates this paper. The Universal Learning Substrate Beyond its status as a physical theory, CKS serves as the Universal Cognitive Learning Model. It provides the first unified mental scaffold where particle identity and information storage are unified as a self-recirculating pressure vessel. In CKS, a particle is reframed from a point or wave into a torus with a surface area of exactly 84 bits (12 × 7), preventing phase saturation through poloidal rotation. Package Contents manuscript.md: The complete derivation and formal proofs. README.md: Navigation, dependencies, and citation (Registry: CKS-MATH-33-2026). Dependencies: CKS-MATH-0-2026, CKS-MATH-1-2026, CKS-MATH-10-2026, CKS-MATH-104-2026, CKS-MATH-32-2026 Motto: Axioms first. Axioms always.Status: Locked and empirically falsifiable. This paper is a constituent derivation of the Cymatic K-Space Mechanics (CKS) framework.