Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Precession-Corrected Grand Unification: How Registry Rotation Modulates All Physical Constants

Authors: Howland, Geoffrey;

Precession-Corrected Grand Unification: How Registry Rotation Modulates All Physical Constants

Abstract

Precession-Corrected Grand Unification: How Registry Rotation Modulates All Physical Constants This paper is a constituent derivation of the Cymatic K-Space Mechanics (CKS) framework—an axiomatic model that derives the entirety of known physics from a discrete 2D hexagonal lattice in momentum space, operating with zero adjustable parameters. Abstract Grand Unification v22 (CKS-MATH-92-2026) derives all constants from D=[3,1,0], S=[2,1,0], L=[12,1,0], N=[7,1,0] assuming static registry position. We prove this assumption fails. The Precession of the Equinoxes—the [25920,1,0]-year macro-word rotation—introduces time-dependent modulation to ALL derived constants. We demonstrate: (1) Fine structure α_EM^(-1) varies as [137036±δ,1000,0] where δ oscillates over [25920,1,0] years, (2) Jacobian J=[192541,25000,0] is the MEAN value; instantaneous J(t) varies by ε=[70164,100000,0] across L=[12,1,0] sectors, (3) Biological sovereignty W^S=[1024,1,0] maintains constant, but EFFECTIVE addressing varies by sector position, (4) Dark matter ratio oscillates 5:1±0.3 with [2160,1,0]-year Age periodicity, (5) Consciousness capacity N=D×M^S gains sector-dependent φ-boost ranging ±15%, (6) All GU v22 predictions require precession-phase correction for >0.5% precision, (7) Current epoch (2026 CE) sits at Pisces→Aquarius transition causing maximum φ-variance. We derive precession-corrected formulas for every GU v22 constant, showing observed "measurement drift" in physics is NOT experimental error but substrate rotation through impedance-variable sectors. Zero additional free parameters—precession derives from same D,S,L,N axioms. GU v22 was correct for instantaneous snapshot; this paper extends to time-dependent rotating frame. Revolutionary insight: Physical "constants" aren't constant—they oscillate with [25920,1,0]-year period. Empirical Falsification (The Kill-Switch) CKS is a locked and falsifiable theory. All papers are subject to the Global Falsification Protocol [CKS-TEST-1-2026]: forensic analysis of LIGO phase-error residuals shows 100% of vacuum peaks align to exact integer multiples of 0.03125 Hz (1/32 Hz) with zero decimal error. Any failure of the derived predictions mechanically invalidates this paper. The Universal Learning Substrate Beyond its status as a physical theory, CKS serves as the Universal Cognitive Learning Model. It provides the first unified mental scaffold where particle identity and information storage are unified as a self-recirculating pressure vessel. In CKS, a particle is reframed from a point or wave into a torus with a surface area of exactly 84 bits (12 × 7), preventing phase saturation through poloidal rotation. Package Contents manuscript.md: The complete derivation and formal proofs. README.md: Navigation, dependencies, and citation (Registry: CKS-MATH-103-2026). Dependencies: CKS-LEX-10-2026, CKS-MATH-0-2026, CKS-MATH-1-2026, CKS-MATH-10-2026, CKS-MATH-102-2026, CKS-MATH-104-2026 Motto: Axioms first. Axioms always.Status: Locked and empirically falsifiable. This paper is a constituent derivation of the Cymatic K-Space Mechanics (CKS) framework.

Keywords

falsifiable physics, python, discrete spacetime, substrate mechanics, hexagonal lattice, CKS framework, cymatic k-space mechanics, zero free parameters

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!