Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Architecture of Reality: The Hypothesis of 35 Levels of Determinism and the Nature of Consciousness

Authors: Fedorov, Mikhail;

The Architecture of Reality: The Hypothesis of 35 Levels of Determinism and the Nature of Consciousness

Abstract

This paper presents a novel metaphysical framework titled the "Theory of 35 Levels," developed through the lens of systemic analysis and risk assessment methodology. The work addresses the "Hard Problem of Consciousness" by proposing a multi-layered structure of the universe where absolute mathematical determinism governs the primary levels of reality. Key concepts explored in this study include: The 35 Levels of Determinism: A hierarchical model of reality where levels 1 through 5 represent the foundational physics (often misinterpreted as chaotic at the quantum level), extending up to complex biological and cognitive prisms. The Dualism of Worlds: A distinction between "World 1" (the mathematical matrix of the universe) and "World 2" (the subjective reality of the Observer). The Rebellion of the Observer: An analysis of the "I" as an entity that exists outside the deterministic code, acting as a non-mathematical signal within a fully calculated environment. Information Matrix and Survival: The hypothesis of consciousness as an informational "backup," providing a physical basis for understanding the continuity of the self beyond biological decay. By bridging the gap between exact sciences and humanitarian philosophy, this research offers a unified spectrum of knowledge, challenging contemporary materialist paradigms and providing new metaphors for the development of Artificial Intelligence and the understanding of human existence.

Keywords

Philosophy, Determinism, Philosophy of Mind, Metaphysics, Modern philosophy, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!