What are the cost-effectiveness and quality of life outcomes for patients undergoing open aortic repair versus stent insertion for aortic aneurysms?

EVAR offers short-term benefits over OSR, including reduced perioperative mortality and faster recovery, but it is generally more expensive and associated with higher long-term costs and reintervention rates. OSR provides better long-term outcomes with lower reintervention needs, making the choice between these procedures dependent on individual patient factors and healthcare settings.

Keywords

aortic aneurysms, surgery, quality of life, cardiology, open aortic repair, patient outcomes, stent insertion, cost-effectiveness

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

0

Average