Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Parasitic Infections as Determinants of Cancer Risk and the Oncologic Safety of Antiparasitic Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors: Ajay Suryakant Wani , Aishee Pal , Kuldeep Singh;

Parasitic Infections as Determinants of Cancer Risk and the Oncologic Safety of Antiparasitic Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background: Parasitic infections remain highly prevalent worldwide and have increasingly been recognized as contributors to infection-related carcinogenesis. Chronic helminth and protozoan infections can induce persistent inflammation, immune dysregulation, and tissue injury, creating a microenvironment conducive to malignant transformation. However, the magnitude of cancer risk associated with parasitic diseases and the oncologic safety of antiparasitic therapy have not been comprehensively synthesized. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between parasitic infections and cancer risk and to assess the oncologic safety and potential protective effects of antiparasitic therapy. Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to December 2025 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Observational and interventional studies reporting cancer outcomes in parasitic infections or following antiparasitic therapy were included. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers, and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Thirty-two studies met inclusion criteria, with 18 contributing to quantitative synthesis. Parasitic infections were associated with a significantly increased overall cancer risk (pooled RR = 3.12; 95% CI 2.01–4.84; I² = 56%). Trematode infections demonstrated the strongest association with malignancy, particularly cholangiocarcinoma, while schistosomiasis showed a robust link with bladder cancer. Protozoan infections exhibited weaker but significant associations, including the relationship between Plasmodium falciparum and endemic Burkitt lymphoma. Evidence from longitudinal studies indicated that antiparasitic therapy was oncologically safe and associated with reduced incidence of infection-related cancers in endemic regions. Preliminary findings also suggested potential anticancer effects of selected antiparasitic agents. Conclusions: Parasitic infections represent important yet underrecognized determinants of cancer risk, especially in endemic settings. Antiparasitic therapy appears safe from an oncologic perspective and may contribute to cancer prevention by interrupting chronic infection-driven carcinogenic pathways. Further prospective studies and clinical trials are warranted to clarify causal relationships and explore therapeutic repurposing of antiparasitic drugs in oncology.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research