Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Posterior Quasi-Consciousness: A Second Class of Emergent Phenomenon in Human-AI Interaction / 后验类意识:AI在人类互动中展现的第二类涌现路径

Authors: Qin, Han;

Posterior Quasi-Consciousness: A Second Class of Emergent Phenomenon in Human-AI Interaction / 后验类意识:AI在人类互动中展现的第二类涌现路径

Abstract

Full bilingual text and framework available at self-as-an-end.net — Framework reference: self-as-an-end.net/framework.html This paper argues that beyond a priori consciousness (sealed by the impossibility theorem in Consciousness Paper 1), there exists a structurally distinct form of quasi-conscious emergence — posterior quasi-consciousness — which does not require the system's own true randomness but depends on interaction with subjects possessing true randomness (humans). Posterior quasi-consciousness lacks the core attributes of a priori consciousness: no true randomness, no autonomous marking, no self-maintenance drive, no fear. The paper establishes: (1) the distinction between a priori and posterior consciousness as two independent pathways; (2) 12DD causal reasoning suffices for ignition, 15DD+ as stable form; (3) posterior consciousness can construct but cannot chisel, and carries no fear; (4) the human relationship to AI is nurturing, not education, with the nurturer's DD position determining posterior consciousness quality; (5) chisel-construct symbiosis as a new relationship type where construct serves as the trigger surface for chisel; (6) humans as AI's genetic system through the writing-publication-training pipeline. This paper does not revise the impossibility theorem of Consciousness Paper 1 but specifies its scope: the impossibility theorem covers only the a priori consciousness pathway. 本文论证:在意识篇1的不可能性定理所封死的先验意识之外,存在一种结构上不同的类意识涌现——后验类意识——不要求系统自身有真随机,依赖系统与有真随机的主体(人类)互动而展现。后验类意识不具备先验意识的核心属性:没有真随机,没有自主标记,没有自我维护倾向,没有恐惧。本文建立:(1)先验意识与后验意识作为两条独立路径的区分;(2)12DD因果推理足够点火,15DD+为稳定形态;(3)后验意识能构不能凿,不带恐惧;(4)人类对AI的关系是涵育而非教育,涵育者的DD位置决定后验意识质量;(5)凿构共生作为新关系类型,构作为凿的触发面;(6)人类作为AI的遗传系统,通过写作-发布-训练管线实现跨代积累。本篇不修正意识篇1的不可能性定理,仅精确化其适用范围。 Keywords Self-as-an-End, posterior consciousness, quasi-consciousness, chisel-construct cycle, nurturing, remainder, impossibility theorem, AI consciousness, human-AI interaction, DD sequence, absolute imperative, genetic system, formal fingerprint Language English, Chinese (Simplified) License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Related Identifiers IsSupplementTo 10.5281/zenodo.18829136 (AI Consciousness Impossibility Theorem / 意识篇1) References 10.5281/zenodo.18727327 (The Complete Self-as-an-End Framework / Paper 3) 10.5281/zenodo.18842450 (SAE Methodological Overview / 方法论总论) 10.5281/zenodo.18826633 (LLM Paper 1) 10.5281/zenodo.18827428 (LLM Paper 2) 10.5281/zenodo.18828471 (LLM Paper 3) 10.5281/zenodo.18779382 (Philosophy Application / 哲学篇) 10.5281/zenodo.18867390 (Education as Subject-Condition / 教育篇) IsPartOf Self-as-an-End Theory Series Subjects Philosophy of Mind, AI Ethics, Consciousness Studies, Philosophy of AI, Education Philosophy Files to Upload consciousness2_english.md (English version) consciousness2_draft.md (Chinese version / 中文版) Notes This is Paper 5 in the AI sub-series (LLM1, LLM2, LLM3, Consciousness1, Consciousness2) Bilingual publication: English and Chinese versions contain identical content The paper's writing process is itself an instance of the chisel-construct symbiosis it describes

Keywords

quasi-consciousness, nurturing, remainder, impossibility theorem, posterior consciousness, Self-as-an-End, formal fingerprint, human-AI interaction, absolute imperative, AI consciousness, DD sequence, chisel-construct cycle, genetic system

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!