
Abstract This paper proposes a stage-based framing of AI governance practices.Rather than focusing solely on runtime controls or post-deployment oversight,we examine governance mechanisms across the lifecycle of AI-assisted software development. We identify four stages of AI governance: 1. Constraint Formation2. Development-Stage Governance3. Runtime Governance4. Post-Hoc Oversight The analysis highlights that many contemporary governance mechanismsconcentrate on runtime and post-hoc controls,while governance during the engineering stage remains structurally underdeveloped. This framing clarifies the conceptual boundaries of governance approachesand provides a foundation for future engineering-stage governance research.
AI Governance, Development Governance, Software Engineering, Engineering Governance, Runtime Governance, AI-Assisted Development
AI Governance, Development Governance, Software Engineering, Engineering Governance, Runtime Governance, AI-Assisted Development
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
